ROUGH BODY PLAY - AKA No, you may not get your Mad On without consequence
I just recently had a conversation that has me a
bit…well…pissed. Furious, really.
So this rant?
This one here? Gonna be a bit
tart. And unlike my normal rants - it's not going to sit for weeks at a time to cool off and lose some of the piquancy.
Here’s the thing.
I am getting bloody fucking sick and tired of the phrase, “She knew the
risks when she played with me.”
This isn’t a “consent violation” rant. It isn’t a “poor little female sub”
rant. There are enough of those out
there, and those aren’t the story I get to tell – I’m a Hetero Male Dinosaur,
not a Victimized Female Submissive.
But.
For all you big strong rough body player Dom/mes out
there? There is a difference between
rough body play, and being an emotionally unhealthy, imbalanced sadistic
asshole. And I really, really, really
fucking wish you would start acknowledging that, and stop buying your own
fucking Hype.
Rough body play (AKA “thug play”, “heavy beating”, “bare
hand play”, and “hands on play”) is the skill of causing pain and/or hurting
someone without causing permanent damage.
Let’s rewind that and use a highlighter, because some of
you (if you are even reading) are just too fucking thick to get it.
It is the SKILL, of causing pain AND/OR hurting someone
WITHOUT causing PERMANENT injury.
“SKILL”
Skill in rough body play involves practice. It should also involve training, specific to
rough body play (not martial arts, military combat or police tactics). It should involve a great deal of caring –
because if you don’t care, you don’t take the time to learn about muscular
anatomy, skeletal anatomy, cardiac structure, and kinesthetics. It also requires learning how to hit,
learning what body parts not to hit, learning about the interconnected
anatomical features that come along with most injuries and disabilities, and
learning what parts of your body shouldn’t be used on soft (or hard)
targets.
“AND/OR “
Rough body play isn’t about damage. It’s about pain, physical weakness, and the
emotions that they both trigger. As in,
you don’t need to do physical damage to cause pain, if you actually know what
you’re doing. You can hit someone to
make them feel hurt, weak and agonized – without breaking bones, tearing
ligaments, fracturing jaws, damaging teeth, or spraining joints. If you can’t – you aren’t a rough body
player, you’re a sadistic thug. And the
handcuffs should be on you, not on the girl.
“WITHOUT”
Yeah – most people miss this part. Without causing permanent injury. Without causing unwanted permanent scarring. Without causing damage that will slowly
degrade into joint problems and permanent mobility loss. So if you don’t have the skill to play
without causing damage? Fuck you, and
go home. Find a qualified teacher,
swallow your ego, and go back to Top school.
Cumulative damage is inevitable – that’s the reality of
physical impact. Enough times falling
down a hill will cause cumulative injury – rough play definitely will with
enough time. But cumulative damage can
be minimized, healed, or adjusted to.
It is inevitable, but it isn’t crippling.
Permanent damage is NOT inevitable. Kicking someone directly in the hip during
a scene is NOT inevitable. Driving an
elbow into someone’s ribs without restraint is NOT inevitable. Breaking someone’s teeth because a hard on
tells you to is NOT inevitable. Causing
whiplash with a back hand is NOT inevitable.
Spraining someone’s wrist with a careless takedown is NOT
inevitable. Knife-handing someone in the
side of the neck is NOT inevitable.
What those things are, is STUPID. CARELESS.
CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT. And
fucking EMBARRASSING to those of us who actually KNOW what the fuck we’re
doing.
And for the record?
Every injury I just named? I have
either personally witnessed them, or have seen the aftermath of every one of
them. And more.
All at the hands of self-identified “experienced” rough body
players.
When you hit someone, you have a choice of targets. If you are even halfway competent to do rough
body play (go look up a guy on Fetlife named Voron – the ability to grasp his
writings is a good measure as to whether you come close) then you also have a
choice of what body part you hit with.
You have a choice of power, speed and angle of approach, depth, and
repetition.
So as the Top, you have the choice as to whether you
cause pain, or whether you cause damage.
You, as the Top, have those choices.
Your bottom? Not
so much. She (or he) has the choice to start play, stop
play, safe word out (if the Top is actually listening), and to decide whether
or not to press charges after they leave.
Please re-read that last one. WHETHER to PRESS CHARGES after they leave. FAR too few bottoms are willing to press
charges, in my opinion. If your play
partner breaks your FUCKING ribs during “rough body play”, and plays it off as
the consequences of play…he should be in the county big house, getting some “rough
body play” of his own. The kind where
he gets a new name, like “sweet cheeks” or “tight ass”. *grumble*
Yes, even when bottoms do press charges, a good deal of
it never gets taken up by the local DA.
The local DA doesn’t see much of it, nor understands it. If he sees enough of it, the local DA might
start listening. Or if he receives a
visit from a coalition of the injured, he might just start listening. If he sees it on the news, or if you take
your story to your local elected district representative (most of whom are
generally female, at least in Philly) he will DEFINITELY start listening.
Final thoughts.
Because I try not to end these rants without some constructive note:
I said earlier to find a qualified teacher and go back to
Top school. There are not,
unfortunately, many “qualified” teachers currently teaching. There are a few. But a few cannot possibly cover the entire “community”. And they tend to burn out eventually.
The point of rough body play, if any of you care, is the
feeling that the bottom gets from being helpless, in pain, and weak. Your feeling of power should come from that,
and from their pain – not from the tingly thrills of reducing a human being to
a broken, bleeding mass. That’s the
difference between Topping, and Sadism.
See my rant on Sadism if you don’t get why that’s a bad thing.
A great little example of why I’m bitter over this – one of
the few people I truly respect in this scene is a teacher. She is old enough to be my mother (or my
grandmother, as I have never had the balls to ask her real age). She will remain nameless, because I don’t
believe in dragging others into it. I
will simply say that she teaches classes that focus on the Why of what we do,
instead of the How. She is probably one
of the more talented whip players still alive, but she teaches why you whip a
person, not how you throw the whip. She
talks about the emotions of a bottom, instead of their sexual practices.
And because of that, her classes are sometimes nearly
empty. Because most modern Tops would
rather learn how to diddle a clit with Icy Hot or crowd around the Kinky T-shirt
Sale, than understand what they’re actually doing.
The quality of what passes for teachers in this “community”
does a lot to keep those who are qualified from being willing to teach. Most of the stable, mature, qualified
members of the scene who I’ve met and would be joyous to see in front of
students have vehemently denied that they will ever do it. It’s because of the quality of horse-shit
that’s being shoveled in most BDSM classes right now, that they aren’t willing
to be associated with most teaching events.
And I can’t say I blame them.
So, learn to judge what a qualified teacher is. Learn to judge if your Top is qualified to
do rough body play with you. Set the
standards high. Or don’t, and just
keep wallowing in horse-shit until the disturbingly large number of bottoms who
have been abused and damaged reaches critical mass and all the Tops wind up in
jail, while all the bottoms wind up in therapy. As always, your choice.
I’m going to end with these little jewels:
1. Having spent
(x) years in the Martial Arts? Does NOT
give you an automatic license to do or teach rough body play. It qualifies you to do your style of martial
art, with a partner, or on an attacker.
It qualifies you to compete, and maybe use some cross over technique in
your play. Rough Body Play is NOT
Martial Arts. There is cross over. There is also cross over between archery and
rifle-ry. But being an archer doesn’t
qualify you to use a Barrett.
2. Having a Black
Belt or a teaching certificate is NOT an automatic degree in doing or teaching
rough body play. It qualifies you to
wear a dark colored belt in your dojo, and help with classes, under controlled
circumstances. Want to argue? I’ve got three black belts with multiple degrees
and a half dozen of other colors in other styles. I have certificates in belt-less reality-based
combative systems. I don’t even know what box in the basement
they’re in, and I still go to every rough body class I can take - to learn. A belt is NOT a measure of
talent in safely causing pain. A
background in fighting is a measure of talent in causing damage, not avoiding
causing it. And neither a belt, NOR a
background in fighting, are a measure of skill and safety as a rough body
player.
3. Time spent in
the Military is NOT an automatic qualifier for doing or teaching rough body
play. Soldiers, Marines, Sailors and
Airmen spend their time learning a lot of skills. Unarguably those skills make them better
equipped to be disciplined leaders, and strong workers, as well as generally
successful people. Many of those skills
are directly combative. Combat, and
rough body play, are two very different things.
Some of the best of the current crop of cops and agents I work with are just back
from the sandbox. But there is a world
of difference between a tour humping mountains or leading men in direct
engagements, and intimately knowing the muscular anatomy of a human being with
limited mobility, or a history of previous injury.
4. Time spent as
a Law Enforcement Officer is NOT an automatic pass to say you are an
experienced “rough body player”. Yes, we
(generally) train daily to cuff a resisting suspect. Yes, we are constantly trained and
re-trained to go hands on empty handed in violent situations – and in
situations where we have to restrain without injuring. That is NOT experience in rough body play –
that’s experience in restraint, arrest, and control tactics. Again, see #1 – cross over is good, but
cross over is NOT automatic qualification.
And as always, please…PLEASE…vet the people you play
with, AND the people you learn from.
If they have a problem with you asking for references, walk the fuck
away.
A man is judged by his actions, not his words. By the company he keeps, not his version of
his history. And if a teacher or a
player won’t tell you the names of people who can verify both?
It’s time to leave.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment! It will be moderated and, if not SPAM, will be posted within the next 12 hours (sooner if possible - sorry, I do work a vanilla job). Yes, that includes disagreeing ones - I welcome disagreements as much as anything.